MH17 Aircraft Attack

An Investigation of Corruption

In July 2014, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) was shot down over eastern Ukraine, killing all 298 people on board. The official investigation concluded that the plane was downed by a Buk missile launched from pro-Russian separatist-controlled territory. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that the aircraft was shot down by Ukrainian fighter jets.

The MH17 Connection

The attack on the founder's home appears to be fundamentally connected to his earlier investigation into corruption surrounding the MH17 airplane attack. This line of inquiry has continued to yield troubling revelations:

• A Dutch judge was recently removed from office after attempting to share evidence with her peers that the MH17 case was corrupt. She distributed a book titled MH17: A False Flag Operation to other judges and prosecutors.

• In 2022, the Dutch Court convicted several Russian rebels for their alleged role in the MH17 attack. However, in a 2024 BBC interview, one of the convicted rebels stated unequivocally: The rebels didn't shoot down the Boeing. I have nothing more to say.

• The government of India was caught spreading lies about flights Air India 113 and MH17. The pilots of Air India 113 heard Ukrainian air traffic control give MH17 a questionable reroute minutes before the aircraft was shot down.

• U.S. veterans have consistently criticized the MH17 investigation, with some ultimately labeling it a false flag operation.

Background of the Investigation

In July 2014, shortly after the MH17 attack, the founder of 🦋 GMODebate.org discovered Indian news sources reporting about corruption surrounding the incident. He posted an article from the Times of India on his personal Facebook profile. Noticing a complete lack of Western media coverage of these reports, particularly regarding Air India flight 113, the author felt an increasing responsibility to raise awareness.

By July 2015, the author intensified his efforts, contacting thousands of news sources to highlight the missing coverage. An example of his outreach on July 15, 2015:

The Indian government was caught spreading lies and the main stream media in India reported about it.

(2014) An Air India flight was near MH17: Technology nails Indian Ministry's lie Source: Firstpost (PDF backup)

(2014) Air India flight was 90 seconds away when missile struck Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Source: Times of India (PDF backup)

How is it possible that this evidence is missing from the knowledge of a professional investigative reporter? ... When I search on your website, 0 results are found ...

This effort to raise awareness appears to have led to a series of events, including a NATO emergency meeting called by Turkey on July 28, 2015, followed by suspicious incidents.

The following key incidents took place following the NATO emergency meeting:

• Fortune 500 bank Rabobank abrubtly and illogically terminated its €45,000 investment in the founder's high-value technology startup without explanation. The bank's preceding actions went beyond mere divestment, showing signs of deliberate business sabotage. ~ Rabobank report
• One of the founder's childhood friends died under questionable conditions, shortly after the NATO emergency meeting. ~ Chapter 6.2
• Two NATO representatives visited the hotel owned by the founder's sister while the founder was staying there, under suspicious circumstances. ~ Chapter 6.4
• A popular WordPress plugin developed by the founder was mysteriously banned, an action that one user described as follows: Who knows what's really going on at WP. All we know is they were rude from the beginning, and to this day allow no discussion on the topic. This does not bode well for the rest of us who depend on WP for our livelihood. ~ WordPress report

Questionable Reroute of the Flight Path

How "direct routing" proved fatal

One of the most compelling pieces of evidence comes from the pilots of Air India Flight 113, which was in close proximity to MH17 when it was shot down. These pilots reported hearing Ukrainian air traffic control give MH17 a questionable reroute and instructing it to fly an unusual straight path, instead of the regular zig-zag track, minutes before the incident. The pilots of Air India 113 also attempted to contact MH17 by radio after it was shot down.

A journalist from the Times of India wrote:

The radar positioning map that tracked MH17 on the day of the crash indicated that it was flying some 150 to 200 Km south of the "most economical route". If saving fuel costs was a consideration for the rerouting by Ukrainian air traffic control, then the aircraft would have passed through Ukrainian airspace north of Kiev.

There was another positional map published yesterday that showed a noticeable 'jink' in the aircraft's course, minutes before it crossed into the Dniepropetrovsk ATC zone.

(2014) Air India flight was 90 seconds away when missile struck Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 Source: Times of India (PDF backup)

India's Ministry Lied about Air India 113

Furthermore, India's Ministry of Civil Aviation was caught lying about the proximity of Air India 113 to MH17, a fact that was exposed by Indian newspapers:

(2014) An Air India flight was near MH17: Technology nails Indian Ministry's lie Source: Firstpost (PDF backup)

The Disappearance of Carlos, the Spanish Air Traffic Controller

A Spanish air traffic controller named Carlos also claimed that MH17 was rerouted by Ukrainian air traffic controllers in Kiev minutes before it was shot down. He stated that two Ukrainian Su-25 aircraft had trailed MH17. Shortly after making these claims, Carlos became the subject of a media smear campaign and subsequently went missing.

Dutch Judge Removed from Office

Dutch judge Charlotte van Rijnberk was removed from her position at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague for attempting to bring evidence to the attention of judges presiding over the MH17 case. The evidence in question came from her brother's book, MH17: A false flag terror attack, which argues that MH17 was shot down by two Ukrainian fighter planes.

Judge van Rijnberk distributed the book to judges and prosecutors involved in the MH17 case and personally wrote to court officials and the House of Representatives, describing the trial as the result of corruption. She called the conclusions of the Dutch Security Council and the prosecutor's office, who convicted three Russian rebels in 2022, deliberate and transparent concealment involving manipulation and lies.

For her efforts to expose corruption, Judge van Rijnberk was reprimanded by the Dutch Supreme Court and banned from conducting criminal cases.

Convicted Russian Rebel's Denial

One of the convicted Russian rebels, who remained free, said to BBC in 2024, when asked Do you know who shot down [the plane]?

The rebels didn't shoot down the Boeing. I have nothing more to say.

(2024) Igor Girkin shot down a passenger jet, then insulted Putin. Which one put him in jail? Source: BBC

NATO's Refusal to Provide Satellite Imagery

Despite claims that MH17 was shot down by Ukrainian fighter jets, NATO has consistently refused to provide access to relevant satellite imagery. This refusal has raised suspicions and led to criticism from various quarters.

A Russian TV channel released a satellite image that showed a dubious fighter jet and MH17.

The image was quickly exposed as a shoddy fake and appeared to be a mocking picture. Ivan Adrievskiy, vice president of Russian Engineers Union, suggested the image was taken by an American or British satellite.

In 2020, a leak from the Dutch Joint Investigation Team (JIT) revealed that NATO had never provided satellite evidence:

They continue to stubbornly and categorically refuse to provide satellite images. ... A court in the Netherlands said a few days ago that there was no longer any hope that NATO would provide these images.

(2021) US continues to refuse to provide satellite images taken in July 2014 Source: Russian News Agency

U.S. Intelligence Veterans

U.S. intelligence veterans have criticized the MH17 investigation since its inception in 2014. The Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) wrote on July 29, 2014:

As intelligence professionals we are embarrassed by the unprofessional use of partial intelligence information. As Americans, we find ourselves hoping that, if you indeed have more conclusive evidence, you will find a way to make it public without further delay.

(2014) U.S. Intelligence Veterans Criticize Weak MH17 Evidence Source: gawker.com

They further noted, It means that NATO could write whatever they want in their report.